Internet and e-mail policy and practice
including Notes on Internet E-mail


2010
Months
Jun

Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own.


Subscribe to this blog


RSS feed


Home :: ICANN


26 Jun 2010

The .XXX fiasco is almost over ICANN

At Friday's meeting of the ICANN board in Brussels, they voted, probably for the last time, to approve the 2004 application for the .XXX domain.

Purely on the merits, there is of course no need for a top level domain for porn. This isn't about the merits, this is about whether ICANN follows its own rules. Despite overheated press reports, .XXX will not make porn any more available online than it already is (how could it?), there is no chance of all porn being forced into .XXX (that's a non-starter under US law), and .XXX will have no effect on the net other than perhaps being a place to put legal but socially marginal porn far away from any accidental visitors.

Back in 2004 ICANN had a round of applications for new TLDs, of which they received ten, including one for .XXX from a company called ICM. The applicant carefully followed every rule, dotted every i, and crossed every t. Two of the applications were dropped at that point, and ICANN could at that point have easily made .XXX go away, but they didn't. The process involved outside consultants evaluating the feasability and support for the proposed domain, the porn industry has never been more than lukewarm about .XXX, and ICANN could easily have said they didn't have community support. Nonetheless, after the first stage of the process, ICANN agreed that ICM had met the requirements for a new TLD.

In 2005 there was a large and rather poorly informed political foofarrah about the evils of online porn, involving Karl Rove and some rightwing religious allies of the Bush administration putting pressure on ICANN to stop .XXX. At that point ICANN could have said, golly, due to the large amount of community opposition we're turning them down and to show we're sorry, we'll refund ICM's application fee, and there would have been grumbling but that would have been the end of it. But they didn't do that, either, the ICANN board just reversed itself without any credible explanation or justification.

Since then, ICANN has been coming up with one transparently bogus excuse after another for the past five years to stall .XXX, hoping the ICM will give up, despite the fact that ICANN's own policies clearly say that ICM has done everything required and ICANN themselves have approved their application. Earlier this year, an external review panel said that ICM is right and ICANN is wrong, and ICANN still came up with a few more nonsense excuses.

ICANN is now in a pickle, because there are two things they're scared of, lawsuits they might lose, and pressure from the US government, and .XXX offers both. If ICANN said no again, ICM would likely sue. Regardless of whether the suit succeeded, ICM would surely depose the board members and senior staff, which would, to put it mildly, document some rather embarassing dirt. The government may lean on them again, or more likely they might decide they have bigger fish to fry, particularly since the political opponents of .XXX are not allies of the current US administration.

Most likely, .XXX will finally get added, there will be another poorly informed political foofarrah rehashing the same old arguments, and then everyone will forget about it since it'll get about two dozen live registrations, and several thousand inactive defensive ones like DISNEY.XXX.

Just after the vote, ICANN president Rod Beckstrom said:

While I accept the contribution to ICANN's accountability and transparency provided by the existence and the use of the independent panel review process, I am nonetheless concerned about the determination by two of the three panelists that the ICANN board should not use business judgment in the conduct of its affairs.

In other words, Beckstrom continues the ICANN tradition that all of ICANN's rules and processes are just for show, and they should ignore them if he doesn't like the outcome. For this they pay him a million dollars a year?


posted at: 01:53 :: permanent link to this entry :: 1 comments
posted at: 01:53 :: permanent link to this entry :: 1 comments

comments...        (Jump to the end to add your own comment)

Never understood the controversy
I've never understood the controversy, I assume it is people thinking if we don't have a place for it, it will go away? Or some other wishful thinking?

As far as I can tell the world divides 3 ways, between those who browse porn who'll find the TLD fine, those who don't care - who don't care, and those who want to block porn (or feel they should - like schools) who will find they can stop the whole TLD easily - and so should be pro a XXX domain.

Presumably there is a 4th group whose motives I don't understand.

(by Simon 27 Jun 2010 01:52)


Add your comment...

Note: all comments require an email address to send a confirmation to verify that it was posted by a person and not a spambot. The comment won't be visible until you click the link in the confirmation. Unless you check the box below, which almost nobody does, your email won't be displayed, and I won't use it for other purposes.

 
Name:
Email: you@wherever (required, for confirmation)
Title: (optional)
Comments:
Show my Email address
Save my Name and Email for next time

Topics


My other sites

Who is this guy?

Airline ticket info

Taughannock Networks

Other blogs

CAUCE
Remembering JD Falk - 10 years later
221 days ago

A keen grasp of the obvious
New Hope for the Dead
464 days ago

Related sites

Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Network Abuse Clearinghouse



© 2005-2020 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.