Internet and e-mail policy and practice
including Notes on Internet E-mail


2026
Months
Apr
May Jun
Jul Aug
Sep Oct
Nov Dec

Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own.


Subscribe to this blog


RSS feed


Home :: Copyright Law

25 Mar 2026

Cox doesn't have to pay a billion dollars Copyright Law
Cox cable, like every ISP, has some users that pirate music. Sony sued them in Virginia, claiming that they were insufficiently diligent in terminating users that got DMCA notices, and said they were vicariously liable because they profited from the infringers' continuing subscriptions. A jury agreed with Sony and awarded them a billion dollars. On appeal the Fourth Circuit agreed. Today the Supreme Court said nope, that's not what the law says.

See more ...


  posted at: 18:02 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
Stable link is https://jl.ly/Copyright_Law/cox.html

29 Jun 2025

Have LLMs broken fair use? Copyright Law
Two sets of authors sued Anthropic and Meta in San Francisco for copyright infringement, arguing that the companies had pirated their works to train their LLMs. Everyone agreed that a key question was whether fair use allowed it, and in both cases the courts looked at the fair use issue before dealing with other aspects of the cases. Even though the facts in both cases were very similar, last week two judges in the same court wrote opinions coming to very different conclusions. How can that happen? Is fair use broken?

See more ...


  posted at: 21:16 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
Stable link is https://jl.ly/Copyright_Law/fairwhat.html

05 Sep 2024

Internet Archive loses their CDL appeal Copyright Law

The Internet Archive's Controlled Digital Lending (CDL) lends out scans of physical books, ensuring that each scan is lent to one person at a time. Publishers sued nd the Archive lost thoroughly in April 2023. The Archive appealed the decision to the Second Circuit court in New York. As I said at the time, the appeal seemed like a long shot since that is the same court that said that Google Books was OK, mostly because it didn't provide full copies of the books.

Yesterday the court published its decision and unsurprisingly, the Archive still lost.

See more ...


  posted at: 04:35 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
Stable link is https://jl.ly/Copyright_Law/archappeal.html

09 Jan 2024

Three weak copyright suits against OpenAI and one stronger one Copyright Law
In the past few months there have been four similar suits filed in New York against OpenAI and Microsoft. All four look superficially similar, and all are likely to be heard by the same judge, but one of them is a lot stronger than the other three.

See more ...


  posted at: 11:15 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
Stable link is https://jl.ly/Copyright_Law/openai3.html

18 Dec 2023

The Internet Archive defends Controlled Digital Lending again Copyright Law

The Internet Archive has a program they call Controlled Digital Lending (CDL). They have scanned a whole lot of physical books, put the books in storage, and then lend out the scans, ensuring that each scan is lent to one person at a time. Publishers don't like this, sued several years ago, and the Archive lost thoroughly in April. The judge ruled on a motion for summary judgment without a trial, which means the judge believed there was no significant dispute about the facts. He found that CDL was not fair use, the scans were a substitute for the paper books, and the Archive lost.

Unsurprisingly, the Archive has appealed the ruling. This looked to me to be a long shot. The appeal is to the Second Circuit which decided the Google Books case. Their decision said that Google's scanning is OK because they don't provide the full contents of the books, but do other stuff that makes it transformative. Since the Archive does provide the full contents of the books, they're out of luck.

The Archive appealed in September but until recently the only activity has been routine stuff like which lawyers will be representing whom On Friday they filed their brief laying out the legal theory of the appeal, and I have to say it's surprisingly strong.

They say that the judge misunderstood what CDL is, that he got all four prongs of the fair use analysis wrong, and that there are significant disagreements about facts that prevent summary judgment.

See more ...


  posted at: 21:26 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
Stable link is https://jl.ly/Copyright_Law/pubappeal.html

Topics


My other sites

Who is this guy?

Airline ticket info

Taughannock Networks

Other blogs

CAUCE
How Harassment Shaped the Internet
50 days ago

Related sites

Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Network Abuse Clearinghouse

My Mastodon feed



© 2005-2024 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.