Internet and e-mail policy and practice including Notes on Internet E-mail

←2017→ Months Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own. Subscribe to this blog RSS feed

Home :: ICANN 30 Apr 2017 Oh, those wild and crazy new TLDs ICANN Among the many issues affecting ICANN's thousand new TLDs is collisions, that is, the same name already used elsewhere. The other uses are non-standard and unofficial, but some names turn out to have been used a lot. One approach to see how bad the collisions are is controlled interruption, in which the TLD publishes wildcard records with obvious impossible values, in the hope that systems that use colliding names see them and do something about it. The process is pretty simple. For 90 days the domain publishes records like these currently in the new .hotels TLD: hotels. 3600 in a 127.0.53.53 hotels. 3600 in mx 10 your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.hotels. hotels. 3600 in txt "Your DNS configuration needs immediate attention see https://icann.org/namecollision" hotels. 3600 in srv 10 10 0 your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.hotels. *.hotels. 3600 in a 127.0.53.53 *.hotels. 3600 in mx 10 your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.hotels. *.hotels. 3600 in txt "Your DNS configuration needs immediate attention see https://icann.org/namecollision" *.hotels. 3600 in srv 10 10 0 your-dns-needs-immediate-attention.hotels. When the 90 days are up, the domain takes out the interruption records, and starts putting in real ones. That's the theory, and what the ICANN registry agreements require. The practice turns out to be different. See more ... posted at: 22:05 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Stable link is https://jl.ly/ICANN/newtldcrud.html 14 Mar 2017 ICANN's Ten Worst Domains ICANN Yesterday at ICANN 58 in Copenhagen there was session on DNS Abuse Mitigation: The Cross Community Topic Discussion proposed by the GAC Public Safety Working Group will focus on ICANN's Efforts, based on answers to questions in Annex 1 of Hyderabad Communiqué with expected contributions from ICANN's SSR Team and Contractual Compliance. In one of the talks, ICANN staff talked about the new Abuse Data Analysis Platform, with an example with live data, including the ten worst gTLDs, ranked by the percentage of the TLD's names that have various abuse indicators (click on the picture to see it at legible size): See more ... posted at: 12:32 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Stable link is https://jl.ly/ICANN/tenworst.html 31 Jul 2016 Almost free domains for almost everyone ICANN The latest ICANN domain auction brought the auction proceeds piggy bank to about $240 million. The application fees for the new gTLD round were $361 million of which, at the end of March, they'd spent $227 million, and their very conservative estimate is that at the end of the process they'll have spent $289 million. If you add the numbers from the private auctions to the ones for the ICANN auctions, it's as much or more than the application costs. These suggest a much better way to pay for the next round. See more ... posted at: 13:10 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Stable link is https://jl.ly/ICANN/cheapauction.html 29 Jul 2016 Holy Petunias! Auction for .web ends at $135 million ICANN Domain Name Wire is reporting that the the winning bid in the auction for .WEB was $135,000,000. Assuming they're right (which they probably are,) that brings the total web auction piggy bank to over $230 million, more than twice what it was two days ago. At the Helsinki meeting there was already a lot of interest in the process to decide how the money is distributed, but now there'll be twice as much. posted at: 11:31 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Stable link is https://jl.ly/ICANN/holypetunias.html 23 Jul 2016 It's auction time again ICANN This week ICANN will auction off .WEB or .WEBS. There are seven live applications for .WEB and one for .WEBS. The string contention process decided that the two names are so similar that they'll only assign one of them, so all eight applications are in one auction. (The same string contention process decided that .ACCOUNTANT and .ACCOUNTANTS are both allowed, as are .AUTO and .AUTOS and .BM and .BMS and .COUPON and .COUPONS and .FAN and .FANS and .GIFT and .GIFTS and .LOAN and .LOANS and .ML and .MLS and .NEW and .NEWS and .REVIEW and .REVIEWS and .SA and .SAS and .SB and .SBS and .TV and .TVS and .WATCH and .WATCHES and .WORK and .WORKS, but I guess the Web is special.) There are some deep pocketed bidders in this round including Google, Donuts, web.com which owns Network Solutions and a lot of other web properties, and Schlund which owns the largest web hoster 1&1. Google paid $25 million for .APP and GMO paid $41 million for .SHOP. It's hard to see how .WEB would be worth less than either of those unless bidder fatigue sets in. So stay tuned and we'll shortly know how much more will be added to the $104 million already in the Giant Pile of Auction Money. posted at: 12:38 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments Stable link is https://jl.ly/ICANN/webauc.html

Topics Copyright Law - 20 Email - 220 ICANN - 120 Internet - 51 Money - 26 My other sites Who is this guy? Airline ticket info Taughannock Networks Other blogs CAUCE The Criminals Behind WannaCry 39 days ago A keen grasp of the obvious A little musical history 391 days ago Related sites Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail Network Abuse Clearinghouse

© 2005-2015 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.