Internet and e-mail policy and practice
including Notes on Internet E-mail


2015
Months
Jul

Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own.


Subscribe to this blog


RSS feed


Home :: ICANN


24 Jul 2015

Dot SUCKS: the ultimate vanity domain ICANN

When last we wrote, trademark lawyers had written an outraged letter to ICANN about the $2500 price to preregister trademark.sucks names, and ICANN, reliably panicking in the face of legal threats, wrote to the US Federal Trade Commission and Canadian Office of Consumer Affairs saying please tell us that's illegal so we can shut down this registry with whom we just signed a long-term contract. (The mysterious $1 surcharge turned out to be a weak attempt by ICANN to collect debts that affiliates of registry owner Momentous defaulted on long ago.)

Now they're back in the news, with a poorly researched Boston Globe article prompted by a NewYork.sucks billboard near Fenway Park. The FTC wrote back in May and the OCA wrote in June, the former expressing a total lack of sympathy at great length, the latter with a two paragraph form letter.

There are now about 6000 names in the .sucks zone file, providing an interesting snapshot of entities that believe that their are famous enough to get complaints yet so fragile that those complaints are a threat, so they're willing to pay $2500 not to protect them against those complaints. Apple is apparently a good example of a fragile brand since they've bought apple.sucks, applecare.sucks, appleinc.sucks, applemusic.sucks, applenews.sucks, applepay.sucks, applestore.sucks, appletv.sucks, applewatch.sucks, ios.sucks, ipad.sucks, ipadair.sucks, ipadmini.sucks, iphone.sucks, iphoto.sucks, ipod.sucks, ipodnano.sucks, ipodtouch.sucks, mac.sucks, macbook.sucks, macbookair.sucks, macosx.sucks, macpro.sucks, macbookpro.sucks, and osx.sucks.

They are not protected for the obvious reason that people can and do put complaint web sites anywhere. Disillusioned fanbois can try applesucks.sucks, or the less expensive applesucks.fail or applesucks.wtf. Since 99.9% of people find web sites by searching rather than typing in domain names, people will be able to find them just as easily as they can find taubmansucks.com, the domain name in the lawsuit that said a name with a brand and sucks does not infringe the brand's trademark since nobody would confuse it with the brand itself.

For that matter, I am tempted to register whyit.sucks, so I can offer names like applecare.whyit.sucks, ipod.whyit.sucks, and so forth. (Note: all of these names are available as of the time I wrote this, but I suspect some won't be available for long.)

On the assumption that most of the names in the .sucks zone file are defensive registrations, let's take a look and see who believes themselves to be famous and fragile, so they have a .sucks name to show it.

Professional sports teams seem fragile across the board: lakers.sucks, losangeleslakers.sucks, manchesterunited.sucks, mapleleafs.sucks, mapleleafsports.sucks, nets.sucks, newyorkgiants.,sucks, newyorkjets.sucks, nfl.sucks, nflnetwork.sucks, nflshop.sucks, nflticketexchange.sucks, patriots.sucks, redskins.sucks, redsox.sucks, and yankees.sucks.

Airlines, too: air-canada.sucks, air-france.sucks, air-new-zealand.sucks, air-norwegian.sucks, air-nz.sucks, airasia.sucks, aircanada.sucks, airfrance.sucks, airnewzealand.sucks, airnorwegian.sucks, airnz.sucks, americanairlines.sucks, americanairlinesemployee.sucks, americanairlinesemployees.sucks, americaneagle.sucks, delta.sucks, deltaairlines.sucks, easyjet.sucks. Nothing for Lufthansa, Singapore, or Cathay Pacific, suggesting that service makes a difference. Nor for Ryanair or Spirit, who don't care what you think because their prices are so low you'll buy tickets anyway.

Some hotel chains are fragile: jwmarriott.sucks, marriott.sucks, marriottexecutiveapartments.sucks, marriotthotels.sucks, marriottrewards.sucks, marriottvacationclub.sucks, marriottvacationsworldwide.sucks, But some aren't, there's nothing for Hilton other than parishilton.sucks, and we're not going there.

Some brands appear to have high opinions of their famousness: newzealandwindowshades.sucks, crowedunlevy.sucks, sungevity.sucks, todoparaprotegerte.sucks, scotiapersonnelltd.sucks, and so on and so forth for thousands of names.

And finally, there's hoover.sucks and oreck.sucks. Hmmn.


posted at: 15:32 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
posted at: 15:32 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments

comments...        (Jump to the end to add your own comment)

Add your comment...

Note: all comments require an email address to send a confirmation to verify that it was posted by a person and not a spambot. The comment won't be visible until you click the link in the confirmation. Unless you check the box below, which almost nobody does, your email won't be displayed, and I won't use it for other purposes.

 
Name:
Email: you@wherever (required, for confirmation)
Title: (optional)
Comments:
Show my Email address
Save my Name and Email for next time

Topics


My other sites

Who is this guy?

Airline ticket info

Taughannock Networks

Other blogs

CAUCE
It turns out you don’t need a license to hunt for spam.
33 days ago

A keen grasp of the obvious
Italian Apple Cake
591 days ago

Related sites

Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Network Abuse Clearinghouse



© 2005-2020 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.