Internet and e-mail policy and practice
including Notes on Internet E-mail


Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own.

Subscribe to this blog

RSS feed

Home :: Email

16 Nov 2006

Dog Eats Opt-Out Requests, FTC Is Not Impressed Email

Last week the Federal Trade Commission settled a lawsuit against Yesmail, a large ESP (Email Service Provider). The facts of the case are not in dispute, but their meaning is.

Yesmail, like most large ESPs, has absorbed a number of its smaller competitors over the years including a company called @Once. Back in 2004, they screwed up their incoming mail so that a whole lot of bounces and opt-out requests were erroneously filtered out as spam. As a result, thousands of people who'd told @Once to stop sending them mail kept getting mail anyway.

Among the modest demands that CAN SPAM puts on bulk mailers is that they have a working opt-out policy. Since they didn't, the FTC filed suit.

Yesmail, which is generally well behaved, feels extremely ill-treated. They argue that the mistake falls under the exception in CAN SPAM that says:

A return electronic mail address or other mechanism does not fail to satisfy the requirements of [having a working opt-out] if it is unexpectedly and temporarily unable to receive messages or process requests due to a technical problem beyond the control of the sender if the problem is corrected within a reasonable time period.

They evidently think that they fixed the problem within a reasonable time period, while the FTC didn't. Since everyone seems to agree that they missed thousands of opt-outs, I have to agree with the FTC.

ESPs are chronically complaining about how hard it is to follow all the rules, all of the requirements the ISPs put on them, and the various laws that affect them, and it's all the fault of the nasty spammers. They're mostly right (except for the part about it being entirely the spammers' fault, since a lot of it is due to their own lousy practices), dealing with all their issues is hard, but you know what? Tough noogies. Each time they screw up, it makes a mess that someone else has to deal with. If they can't figure out how to send mail in a way that recipients will accept and that follows the law, that's nobody's problem but theirs.

posted at: 21:26 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
posted at: 21:26 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments

comments...        (Jump to the end to add your own comment)

Add your comment...

Note: all comments require an email address to send a confirmation to verify that it was posted by a person and not a spambot. The comment won't be visible until you click the link in the confirmation. Unless you check the box below, which almost nobody does, your email won't be displayed, and I won't use it for other purposes.

Email: you@wherever (required, for confirmation)
Title: (optional)
Show my Email address
Save my Name and Email for next time


My other sites

Who is this guy?

Airline ticket info

Taughannock Networks

Other blogs

Phishing Landscape 2020: A Study of the Scope and Distribution of Phishing
14 days ago

A keen grasp of the obvious
My high security debit card
677 days ago

Related sites

Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Network Abuse Clearinghouse

© 2005-2020 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.