|
Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own. Subscribe to this blog |
16 Dec 2006
In a story reported yesterday at Out-Law.com, and in the Milton Keynes local paper, Microsoft win a suit against Paul McDonald (a/k/a Gary Webb) for illegally selling e-mail addresses. McDonald ran a small company called Bizads which claimed to sell opt-in lists of opportinity seekers. But the court concluded he was actually selling overpriced bogus prospect lists to pornorgraphers, for the remarkably high price of £150 for 250 addresses. Microsoft said the lists included addressses of unhappy users of their Hotmail service who had not opted in, as well as spamtraps set up just to catch cases like this. They persuaded the judge that they were suffering loss of goodwill due to user complaints, and won about as thoroughly as they possibly could. The judge granted summary judgement, issued an injunction, and will consider compensation. Since the UK rule is that the loser pays the winner's costs, the compensation may well be substantial. Beyond the obvious fact that it is an impressively bad idea to sell scraped lists of addresses at one of the world's largest and most litigious ISPs to pornographers, this case sets a favorable precedent that both the targets of spam and their ISPs have standing against spammers in the UK. Since the UK laws are related to EU-wide privacy and anti-spam directives, this may be of use in persuading courts in other European countries to act.
|
TopicsMy other sitesOther blogsCAUCE A keen grasp of the obvious Related sitesCoalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail |
© 2005-2024 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will
not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this
website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling
others to initiate, electronic mail messages.