Internet and e-mail policy and practice
including Notes on Internet E-mail


2012
Months
Nov

Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own.


Subscribe to this blog


RSS feed

Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe with Bloglines


[Valid RSS]

Home :: ICANN


30 Nov 2012

Verisign dodges a bullet, gets to keep .COM pricing ICANN

According to a filing with the SEC, the Department of Commerce renewed the .COM agreement for six more years.

The renewal was held up until the last minute (the old agreement expires today) due to antitrust concerns, specifcally about pricing. The main change in the new agreement is that Verisign is no longer allowed to increase the price above the existing $7.85, except under some unlikely conditions such as an extremely expensive security problem, or Verisign persuades the government that the .COM domain is no longer dominant.

The reason I say they dodged a bullet is that there is no economic justification at all for the $7.85 price. Verisign has never, as far as I can tell, offered any basis for their pricing beyond the obvious facts that a whole lot of people are willing to register domains at the current price, and they provide good service.

The .NET domain, which is run identically to .COM, same service, same servers, same everything else, costs $5.86 rather than $7.85. In an investigation of monopoly pricing, one normally looks to see cost justification of the prices. Verisign competed very vigorusly for the .NET renewal in 2005, and did not ask for price increases beyond what they'd already agreed when it was renewed in 2011, so they presumably consider .NET a profitable and desirable business. An obvious question that has never been answered is why they can't run .COM for the same price. Evidently that question still hasn't been asked, since the .COM price stayed the same.

The new agreement has some other minor interesting aspects. It allows ICANN to require the registry to switch from a thin to thick WHOIS, or to the WEIRDS protocol under development in the IETF if the IETF ever finishes it.

The major winners from the price restraint is more likely to be registrars than registrants. I am a small reseller for Tucows, who pass the registry fee straight through with a fixed surcharge and let resellers charge whatever they want. If the .COM price had gone up from $7.85 to $8.40 as it was scheduled to, I probably would have eaten the extra cost and not raised prices until next year, but now I don't have to.


posted at: 16:56 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments
posted at: 16:56 :: permanent link to this entry :: 0 comments

comments...        (Jump to the end to add your own comment)

Add your comment...

Note: all comments require an email address to send a confirmation to verify that it was posted by a person and not a spambot. The comment won't be visible until you click the link in the confirmation. Unless you check the box below, which almost nobody does, your email won't be displayed, and I won't use it for other purposes.

 
Name:
Email: you@wherever (required, for confirmation)
Title: (optional)
Comments:
Show my Email address
Save my Name and Email for next time

Topics


My other sites

Who is this guy?

Airline ticket info

Taughannock Networks

Other blogs

CAUCE
The Crap They Sell Online
29 days ago

A keen grasp of the obvious
At least they're warm blooded
114 days ago

Related sites

Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Network Abuse Clearinghouse



© 2005-2011 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.