Internet and e-mail policy and practice
including Notes on Internet E-mail


2007
Months
Sep

Click the comments link on any story to see comments or add your own.


Subscribe to this blog


RSS feed

Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe with Bloglines


[Valid RSS]

Home :: Email


08 Sep 2007

Spamford Wallace gets sued yet again Email

If there were a lifetime achievement award for losing lawsuits for being annoying, Sanford Wallace would be a shoo-in. Fifteen years ago, his junk faxing was a major impetus for the TCPA, the law outlawing junk faxes. Later in the 1990s, his Cyber Promotions set important legal precedents about spam in cases where he lost to Compuserve and AOL. Two years ago, he lost a suit to FTC who sued his Smartbot.net for stuffing spyware onto people's computers. And now, lest anyone think that he's run out of bad ideas, he's back, on the receiving end of a lawsuit from MySpace.

According to the injunction, the facts of the case are similar to but more egregious than the ones in MySpace vs. theglobe.com which was settled a few months ago by theglobe paying MySpace all the money they had, about $2 million. Like theglobe, Wallace signed up for large numbers of MySpace accounts with fake info, and used them to send junk messages to MySpace members, over 11,000 accounts in Wallace's case. But, not willing to leave bad enough alone, Wallace also phished the login info for over 320,000 real MySpace accounts and used them to send spam, too. (We leave it as an exercise for the reader what it says about MySpace users that over 300,000 of them fell for Wallace's phish.)

Since the facts of this case are so similar to theglobe, and the case is before the same court, it is not surprising that the judge came up with the same answers to the questions presented. One of the questions was whether CAN SPAM applies to messages within MySpace, which both judges firmly answered in the affirmative. Despite some comments to the contrary (see my comments and the response in this blog), MySpace messages meet the definition of e-mail within CAN SPAM, which is basically a message sent to an address. If Congress wanted to restrict CAN SPAM to SMTP mail, or mail between different providers, they could easily have done so. But they didn't.

This is just a preliminary injunction, but in view of what happened with TheGlobe, this case should be a slam dunk for MySpace, with the main question being how much money they can get Spamford to disgorge. Should be fun to watch.


posted at: 00:14 :: permanent link to this entry :: 1 comments
posted at: 00:14 :: permanent link to this entry :: 1 comments

comments...        (Jump to the end to add your own comment)


I'm sorry, but "fun to watch" is a mis-statement. Disgusting and disparaging are better terms. As you said, this has been going on for 15 years, and laws were put in place to constrain his (and this type of) activity. Clearly they either do not work, or are not being enforced on this repeat offender. Why? Who knows, but in a 15 year time span I would hope that a judge would grow a set and throw the book at this guy. Apparently not, and that is the most disgusting part about this. Again, not that he did it, but that he got away with it for so long.

(by Eric 28 Dec 2007 23:36)


Add your comment...

Note: all comments require an email address to send a confirmation to verify that it was posted by a person and not a spambot. The comment won't be visible until you click the link in the confirmation. Unless you check the box below, which almost nobody does, your email won't be displayed, and I won't use it for other purposes.

 
Name:
Email: you@wherever (required, for confirmation)
Title: (optional)
Comments:
Show my Email address
Save my Name and Email for next time

Topics


My other sites

Who is this guy?

Airline ticket info

Taughannock Networks

Other blogs

CAUCE
CASL Comes into Force
150 days ago

A keen grasp of the obvious
Progress in e-mail
71 days ago

Related sites

Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail

Network Abuse Clearinghouse



© 2005-2014 John R. Levine.
CAN SPAM address harvesting notice: the operator of this website will not give, sell, or otherwise transfer addresses maintained by this website to any other party for the purposes of initiating, or enabling others to initiate, electronic mail messages.